Announcing a new feature: Retro Reviews
by Patricia | 6.11.10Over the last couple of years, my family’s home business has moved into reproducing public domain documents, movies, and other materials to sell on that juggernaut Ebay and, eventually, on our own website. Recently, I became more involved with writing auction descriptions for old films, some from as far back as the 30s. To save time (or to employ the illusion of time in a practical manner), I tried writing descriptions from synopses others have written but discovered that many weren’t reliable. One synopsis writer would seem to have watched an entirely different movie from another writer profiling the same movie. So to set down the most accurate descriptions I could, I gave in and started watching the movies I needed to describe. The job has its ups and downs, but I’m picking up interesting facts and ideas from both the heights, the depths, and the fair-to-middling cinematic ground of Hollywood’s fairest dreams … and unintentional nightmares.
I’m not much at writing advertising copy, such language seeming to me to be one of the most problematic rhetorical zones in human expression. If I personally find a movie distasteful, I have a hard time keeping my irritation out of my description, let alone sprinkling glitter to make the movie appear attractive. Such a challenge popped up a few days ago after I watched the 1932 movie Three Wise Girls starring Jean Harlow. What a cynical movie. To my eye, there’s not an admirable wrinkle in the brows of any of the male leads. But Three Wise Girls is an artifact from Hollywood culture during the days that led up to the instituting of the Hays Code and as such has some historical value. I think. Anyway, it appears to be a much sought after movie. For whatever reasons.
Since I’ll be watching these old movies regularly, I thought I’d post some of my description-reviews of films I watch in which nature figures prominently and even offer opinions about the quality of the stories. While these movies won’t have much direct bearing on the development of Mormon nature writing, they tap into that great aquifer of nature narrative and might prompt thought in aspiring Mormon nature writers about what’s possible as far as stories that take nature as their subject–perhaps even extending to poetry that does the same, à la Robert Service. Nature has always provided at the very least stunning backdrops for human-centric drama. In some cases, nature-themed stories whip up whopper adversaries and exotic settings where anything is possible. Think Moby Dick, life in lush jungles, dinosaurs in hidden valleys. Are space aliens nature? Yeah, I think at least some qualify. Or maybe, by the light of advanced alien behavior and philosophy, it will become more apparent that we are. However, the dharma of Hollywood aliens cannot exceed the quality of mind of the human scriptwriters who imagine them, so don’t hold your breath for advanced civilization to come soon to a theater near you.
I hope you’ll enjoy these reviews. I’m not much for telling others what they should or shouldn’t watch, but there might here and there be a long-forgotten treasure capable of stirring the creative juices for nature writers. Let’s see, shall we?
June 11th, 2010 at 1:22 pm
Sounds interesting—for non-Mormon readers/aspiring-writers too. I enjoy both older movies (sometimes) and nature writing, so look forward to seeing what you come up with.
June 11th, 2010 at 1:55 pm
Yes, certainly, non-Mormon aspiring readers/writers are inclusively included, Bill.
First up: The Wild North, starring Stewart Granger, with Cyd Charisse playing a character billed only as “Indian Woman.” A surprisingly complex little movie I liked very much.
Somewhere along the line I’ll be watching Jungle Princess and Her Jungle Love, Dorothy Lamour movies. Can’t wait.
June 16th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
We watched The Road to Bali recently. It’s an old Bob Hope/Bing Crosby ‘road film’. It has little to do with nature, but the humor was fascinating. At one point three quarters of the way through, Bob Hope whimpers, “Is this movie done yet?”
There was also a lot of girl chasing. My daughters were aghast.
June 27th, 2010 at 8:40 pm
I vaguely remember seeing one or more of these “road films” but think I must have blocked out the experience.
March 30th, 2011 at 12:04 pm
Today, I will give a general response here rather than refer to specific movies: I too am intrigued by classic movies, whether “B” films or academy award winners. Sometimes, before regulatory rating of cinema, I find amazing, gusty
tries at in-depth characterization and topics perhaps not quite acceptable to audiences merely seeking diversion in Main street theaters with their families. I am not well-studied in the history of cinema and its sociological impact, but I am sure there are many old articles, civic and religious, for primary research on public acclaim or disdain for this budding artistic expression or knock-’em-out, dread-’em-out plot lines. Post-secondary institutions offer media classes for the study of and analysis of early and later film. I never taught one of these classes but was privy of them and students’ enormous interest in cinema-related studies, as apart from traditional courses in exposition and research, which I taught.
For myself, these days, I will watch a classic film much more often than contemporary movies. This my reason for my being intrigued by Retro Reviews at WIZ. I’m learning along with everyone else. In films, various humans’ relationship to natural settings–its portrayal and possible interpretations, considering the time period and societal norms–is a worthy point of entry into cinematic review. If the screenwriters gleaned their scripts from novels or pulp fiction, that can be considered also. My remarks are made with adult audience only viewing the films, as it is at my home. Parents with children would have censoring concerns to address when tuning in to a movie or buying a DVD.